Replies to post #44489 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

You think Ace "could have" said it in.....

order to get paid, if in fact the "alleged" interview occurred? Could that be a motive IF he was owed back pay, because if true it shows he lacks understanding of salvage law in Florida, which is available online and easily verified.

I think it would have been a much better post if someone's boss wasn't on the line with Ace and you when you asked the questions. But I admire you for getting some answers.

I also think since Ace signed a non disclosure and that he had to watch what he disclosed. I like the fact that Ace has been paid. You asked him if he was behind in pay for over 2 months and then if he was behind in pay for 30 days. I personally would have asked him " IF " he was ever behind in pay for 2 months or 30 days. Big difference in how he would answer that question.

I noticed a direct quote from me about the lenders making up the 80/20 agreement was asked...."allegedly", and we know how much SFRX and lenders are worried about losing control of the message board(s).....hence the lawsuit.