it's not complicated at all.
USPR HAD THEIR ORIGINAL TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE USPR WEBSITE LISTED AS A 43-101 FOR YEARS AND YEARS. THAT'S A FACT. YET THE CANADIAN GOVT NEVER SAID IT WAS A COMPLIANT 43-101.
now, stating that the report they will have commissioned is in some way "compliant" with a 43-101 is very, very misleading. the only entity that can claim the report is compliant is the canadian govt. so some "qualified person" can say what he wants, but only the canadian govt can say it actually is compliant. so it begs the question, why go there at all???
i never said the sec will send a letter