No...by purposely claiming to not understand changes post...and clearly being the leader/expert on NNVC with condescending posts attacking NNVC. The challenge to is to either do the peer review yourself and debunk NNVC once and for all (which by your own words admit you aren't a peer), or use your implied influence to facilitate a peer to peer review. (Which also won't happen either)...it's really just another of the endlessly false arguments that bore Bulls and excite bears...NNVC continues to progress and will announce when ready...and those who are negative will be caught unready.
Design, develop, and manufacture CIDES...is the goal...every day they get closer...will have done it for less money...in record time...and will control the process from A-Z.
Simply implying disaster...with implied inside information...character assassination of the docs, mischaracterization of course corrections NNVC had to make are all arguments of distraction.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
