Replies to post #111871 on Bravada International Ltd (BRAV)

[Nabbbss]

Three-out-of-Five are BETTER than a month ago...GO BRAV!$

This is according to yesterday's ALEXA Ratings, compared with the
same ALEXA Ratings of one month ago (July 24).

The LOWER the ALEXA Number, the HIGHER in prominence, aware-
ness, and visibility (the more frequently accessed) the Website...and the
BUSIER the Website.

There's not necessarily a 100%-perfect-correlation between those
Ratings AND Gross Revenue Dollar-Volume...BUT...

...BUT there certainly is a broad, general, "loose" correlation.

To push the point, if OnlyLeggings showed an ALEXA Rating of say,
22,000 (it's currently 70,000), SURELY there would be more/higher
Gross Revenues associated with that much-higher ALEXA Rating.

Common Sensa, yes. It's not a firmly-affixed, absolute calculation
or computation, and there is no perfect so-called "algorithm"
associated with it, either.

But clearly, one would have to conclude that an ALEXA Rating of
22,000 for a given Retail Website surely must indicate higher
and greater Gross Revenues than a Rating of 70,000 and...

...in the case of OnlyLeggings, which showed a Rating of 77,000
a month ago, and 70,000 yesterday...well hell, THAT is a 10% gain
or improvement...and that's nothing to sneeze at. Nothing to sniff
at, either. Nor is it anything to snort at, or sneer at.

Alright, okay, okay, okay Nabbbss........ :-)

[EDIT] ...In comparison, and to provide some perspective...
...Target = 42 ALEXA Rating
...Kohls = 86
...Barns and Noble = 288
...Lululemon = 1,796
...NastyGal = 2,581