semper, not correct IMO.
- What about CEO King assigning his rights of the PS-targeting Patents to PPHM rather then to UTSW (as did P. Thorpe)?
- What about ES saving the money with his cash contributions when nobody else wanted to give PPHM a loan?
I could possibly follow the reasoning for Pohl, Carlton and our CFO.
We tend to forget when they do things for PPHM. We find it normal that UTSW gets compensated for the IP rights, but NOT CEO King. remarkable.
We find it normal that a banker rips PPHM of with interests, loan recall fees, etc but not that ES provides us the cash without all those troubles as he injected it in the capital AT the moment of the HIGHEST RISK for PPHM.
I know why I stand behind this management: They stuck their necks out and provided PPHM with IP right that are crucial. Now that everything starts to come together and we have no more creditors, own our IP and pipelines 100% unencumbered and have a SUNRISE PIII trial close to approval, now we suddenly have a problem with compensation.
Believe me a FULL 8 or 12 member Bod would cost us MUCH MORE in total.