InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RedFox7

06/16/06 9:00 PM

#257706 RE: CFlynn #257705

where is the continuity about the E-
mail? To much giration and variation and
accuisations. An e-mail is plain and simple!
Post it and let it be read for what it is.
All this liar this, and liar that, just produces
skeptisum. This whole e-mail thing is starting
to sound like a crock of coagulated sh#t ! imo
icon url

ltesprit

06/16/06 10:34 PM

#257713 RE: CFlynn #257705

No surprise. Fan is probably talking out of both sides of his mouth. The guy is in a tough position: he lost a lot of money (his and his 'partners') and owes a few payroll cycles to the Q skeleton crew. If he assumed ownership of Q, he owes the backpay Olsen neglected to pay, too. Olsen isn't off the hook here, though. He has personal culpability for misleading employees and shareholders. That cannot be 'sold'.

Fan was an insider shareholder apparently and when he took over Q he stepped out of the frying pan and into the fire. Now he's under pressure from employees and shareholders, with no financial resources left to satisfy all their claims. Sounds like he's been making promises he hopes to keep, but can't possibly. Not too bright.
icon url

happyboyrock

06/17/06 8:23 AM

#257725 RE: CFlynn #257705

chris,

Ok, i'm glad you say that mail because i was starting to wonder if that was real. Now, my understanding is your claim fan is moving his business offshore. Where did you get that info? From what I heard he had other companies already. He is trying to pull resources from oversea to save the network. You think it's something that can be completed in a matter of weeks? Should he make know what the plans are now?

If fan was working with goverment agencies, it should be kept a secret..surprise attack is better IMO. So stop asking for him to speak or answer question. We waited a few weeks and a few more wont hurt.

You jumped to conclusion on fan so I'm jumping to conclusion on you too. You think it's fair?