InvestorsHub Logo

IL Padrino

08/17/15 1:36 PM

#310913 RE: Dollars1 #310912

That's potentially good news unless they are trying to defend the administration's actions.

JosephS

08/17/15 3:06 PM

#310917 RE: Dollars1 #310912

This is a thing of beauty. Using Watt's public comments on the issue to show that the depositions are not an issue and that he is certainly ok with it since he doesn't lay awake at night thinking about little guys like me. Too good. The lawyering begins. ..

TII

08/17/15 3:18 PM

#310918 RE: Dollars1 #310912

D1, thanks for posting this. Question...does the govt get to respond to this filing or is it time for Sweeney to talk next?

Hvp123

08/17/15 3:59 PM

#310923 RE: Dollars1 #310912

Thanks D, now lets wait for Sweeney's order.
TII I am getting motion sickness too :)
Could you two see any major difference between pershing's amended filling? It was too late in the night for me when I read it :)

Donotunderstand

08/17/15 7:39 PM

#310937 RE: Dollars1 #310912

Reply to response motion

and this is the NYT "arguing"

can you review the last four batters

thanks

seems a Reply to the NYT would not come from the NYT

but I had appellee wrong so I will await illumination