First, I cannot intelligently accept the proposition that the RB/I-Hub share count means absolutely nothing. I believe the share count means something rather substantial -- it gives us a sense of some validity to the existence of an exceptionally large short interest, one that, quite amazingly, was already clearly evident July of last year with the generation of that DTC One Time Special Security Position Report, which had only shown about 1/12 of the actual holdings of beneficial owners.
BBB I'm sure that there's something somewhere that you CAN do intelligently, but I become more convinced that writing on investing and how business/publicly traded companies works is NOT one of them. If that experiment your doing with supposed shareholders and their holdings is doing anything besides wasting your time, it's proving without a shadow of doubt that 1)there is a printing press going, and 2)dialer don't know how to tell the truth. Rather than accepting that Dial is doing something completely legal and well within his right to do, (printing shares to sell to keep a failing tool rental company going- pitifully low tool rental rate- 3% but we'lll get to that later) you're going on the assumption that someone is doing something that although common, is completely illegl and unacceptable- naked shorting grifco stock. Smell the coffee dude. Dialer is printing more shares to keep the company going while trying to put the best face on it and not wanting to admit it to his biggest fan, OR, -- some wacko conspiracy theory about naked shorting? Which is more likely to be true when you can account for almost 30 million shares on a float that's supposedly less than 9 million?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
