InvestorsHub Logo

Notimpressed

08/14/15 2:24 PM

#61916 RE: Krysti #61899

lacked the finality of successful litigation, buy-outs, or income generation? I would hope the realization has set in that **LICENSE AGREEMENTS** and ROYALTIES constitute **SUCCESSFUL LITIGATION**......REVO never **STATED a BUYOUT was being INKED.....PRd' only NEGOTIATED.....NEVER SAID.........BUYOUT.....FINALIZING !!! ROYALTIES were never PRd' as RECEIVED, yet that has proved to be the AGREEMENT NOW REACHED !!!! ***INCOME GENERATION*** now REACHED !!!.........QUOTE; "And delayed their involvement until it could be shown that REVO misrepresentations lacked the finality"...........Please SUPPLY the PRd'...** DATES of FINALIZATION ** REVO used in the PRs'.....(this started in FEB 2015 by SEC)...... On August 11 REVO filed an 8-K admitting that the SEC had not accepted the Accounting Methods REVO BELEIVED to be Accurate, and HAD TESTIFIED to those Beliefs.......WHO could possibly TESTIFY or PROVE that CARTER did NOT Believe the Accounting was ACCURATE at the time of filling................BEST OF ALL....PROVE that "INVESTORS MISLEAD"........ state what part of REVO LOSS reporting FINANCIAL STATEMENTS were the REASON they Invested.......and point to WHAT part of the Financials caused INVESTMENT mis representation....... The SEC got involved after REVO (so called) lies were considered old PREMATURELY.......EVEN THOUGH no TIMETABLE was EVER STATED !!!!!!! .......Simple FACT...NO SEC Investigation **FINALIZATION** has been Documented..... "lacking "EXPRESSED FINALITY" just BOOMERANGED !!!!