InvestorsHub Logo

Mad Money Monkey

08/13/15 10:13 PM

#142641 RE: justicewillbesoon #142640

No offense bro, but I'm just not feeling it. If this ticker and anyone associated with it were legit, things would not have turned out the way they have. No point in throwing $$$ at an old ticker with new clothes. But, if it is legit, like you think, I haven't sold (a whopping $98.43 if I did), so I guess I might still recover some $. JMO. GLTY!

Huggy Bear

08/13/15 10:28 PM

#142642 RE: justicewillbesoon #142640

It is allgood. CMR says DSUS intends to honor those certs and everyone knows their word is as good as their subcontractors, right?

No deception going on here, nah, none whatsoever. (Eyes rolling back into skull)

pitboss22

08/13/15 10:33 PM

#142643 RE: justicewillbesoon #142640

Answer: Those "gift certs" are NOT "gifts". They are duly authorized shares of the company, with rights specified in the company bylaws just like all the other shares of the company. How would investors feel if the company just decided to cancel all current shares and sell new ones? LOLOLOL!!!

I think the problem lies in the term "certs". Some evidently do not understand that "certs" is short for Certificates of OWNERSHIP of SHARES, duly authorized, issued and outstanding. They are as much a part of the company as ANY other shares. ;-)

Hope that helps :-D

pitboss22

08/13/15 10:43 PM

#142644 RE: justicewillbesoon #142640

By the way, Preferred shareholder rights come BEFORE common shareholder rights. That's why they are called "Preferred". :-D