Replies to post #114214 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[Its_lose_not_loose]

May I ask how long you've been following this board? I've been here for several years. You don't see the puffers here as much, since the price has been falling steadily over the last several months.

But years ago, you would be shocked at how brazen the pumpers were: claims of $100, $200, $1000, $2000 per share were always just around the corner. Oh, and the unwavering belief that the principals of the company were justified taking exorbitant salaries and bennies year after year, while producing nothing but appearances at some conference or another.

Go back a few years and you'll get a different picture.

[JG36]

You seem to be saying that saintly longs can't talk a stock up but demonic shorts can talk a stock down.

Me, I think the influence of message boards like this have been greatly exaggerated. A company that achieves its goals will go up, regardless of what its detractors say. A company that consistently fails will go down, regardless of what the boosters say.

Now, which has NNVC been doing -- achieving its goals, as stated in timelines long since removed from its web site, or consistently failing?

[Nanotoday]

I can only speak for myself, but the reason I point out the numerous and obvious inaccurate and in my opinion intentionally misleading statements made by the company and its executives is to keep others from getting screwed and to shine a light on what I believe to be despicable behavior of management.

As I've said before, if you saw a pickpocket on a bus grab 2 people's wallets and was about to hit his 3rd mark, would you try and warn the mark or let them get robbed? Those who do nothing to try and help others avoid peril are implicit in the act.

The notion that negative posters here have no contact with managment or access to company developments is ignorant. Especially when the positive comments and posts by others who claim to get their info from direct contact with management and access to information are heralded as truth tellers.

To me, it's a simple question of which group has been more accurate? The petty picking at minute issues and lack of posting of trivial or even major developments doesn't diminish the accuracy of the other posts. Look at who has made claims that have been accurate and who has made claims that remain completely unfulfilled.

If you'd like, we can rehash the list over the past 3,5, or 9 years. The table is clearly in favor of one side. That is just a fact.