Replies to post #116518 on Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (IPIX)

[Drano]

He gave very little new information. You were asking for a lot of new information to be given out.

There is a difference. Keep trying to twist my words, I will keep refuting you.

Here's what YOU were asking for:

Why not say one word about the higher doses. 4 of 9 stable disease at doses up to 450 for ovarian CA. He knows the data for the higher doses so why not say anything about it? If there was good data, then he could crush these shorters like bugs and the stock would fly. How about, with higher doses we saw better responses, and we await further information . If he can talk about the earlier doses then why not talk about the higher doses? Because those patients have not had their 6 month scans? Because the data is not so good? I believe it is the latter, and that further benefit will have to wait for more aggressive regimens, like 1000 3x week?

We need to answer: why this missed opportunity to tell a bigger and better story?

[Drano]

You also stated that you think the data was "not so good." On what do you base that opinion? Please tell us your inside scientific information that none of the rest of us have.

Your statement also shows what you really think of this stock.