InvestorsHub Logo

Notimpressed

08/07/15 1:50 PM

#61569 RE: Krysti #61563

Quote:
III. BACKGROUND OF EYETALK365
Eyetalk owns all rights, title, and interest to the patents-in-suit and to several other patents......A **QUICK VIEW** and you will SEE that the Attorney **STOPS SHORT** of saying they OWN the PATENTS.....because they DON'T OWN the Patents......In order for EYETALK365 to File "patents-in-suit" They had to have " all rights, title, and interest" which they did......The WANNA BE "Best Defense Lawyers money can BUY" tried to have the suits dismissed based on REVO PATENT OWNERSHIP...BUT.....(oouuccchhhh) the "all rights, title, and interest" was proper qualification to BRING the suits as FILED. So your Quote "My interpretation of the agreement with Eyetalk365 isn't too different to yours":.......WELL it's VERY Different......REVO OWNS the PATENTS......PERIOD........REVO also OWNS a 40% MEMBER INTEREST in EYETALK365 ***ABOVE and BEYOND*** the 40% of ALL GROSS REVENUES !!!.......Why not YOU call the ATTORNEYS? (I am sure they could use a BELLY SPLITTING LAUGH when you explain your MISINFORMATION THEORY) !!!!!!......... You should correct yourself !!!!!!!.....With ALL the FREE RIDERS Identified, and only 4 Suits filed to Date .......**REVO** could "TERMINATE" the Agreement ANY TIME they choose for Performance Failure as defined in the CONTRACT....."Duty to pursue ALL violators" of REVO PATENTS. 130+ violators are ALREADY Identified.......REVO holds the CARDS on that........