You are lashing out IMO. My sources information and my posts have clearly stated that some of the content are just thoughts worthy of consideration at the least with a significant weight of probability. Regarding a proxy or stand in, why would the CEO not be prepared for a situation that has a credible probability of occurring? I know I would probably at least prepare for the worst case. Why wouldn't he?
Other content of my posts such as the transactions, investment firm, Consac, LLC are supported by fact easily confirmed with research.
If you find my posts annoying, just don't read them. Pretty simple.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
