Replies to post #29657 on Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[livinginsv]

bottom line, SHE'S GONE.

[guardiangel]

LOL the bottom line is Patricia Baker never worked for GCDX..According to you and others...William could not even raise funds in the fund raiser..How could William pay Patricia?

Here is where GS/GSOK are confused....

Patricia worked at PLS andP DX at the same time..

Here is PLS from her resume...

EXPERIENCE - Current/Recent 6 years

4/11 - 5/12 Laboratory Director, Diagnostic Laboratories, Burbank, CA,

Tempe, AZ, Aurora Colorado

-Full Service Clinical Lab CLIA compliance

Here it is when she was working with PDX/Breast Cancer Studies

9/09 - 6/12 Laboratory Director, Provista Diagnostics Laboratory,

Phoenix Az.

-CLIA compliance


http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2010/ay/c0ay00038h/unauth#!divAbstract


Glad to be great assistance toy you all you understand ahooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

[GetSeriousOK]

guardiangel, you said:

"Patricia Baker never worked for GCDX.her name was just placed on the smoke screen web site. "

Please clarify. You think GCDx was dishonest on their website? You think GCDx was, and still is, a smokescreen? Were their crowdsourcing campaigns also fake, then?

guardiangel you also said:

"Why would William need a lab director when he has one at the company he is VP at? That being Provista Diagnostics Inc. you understand...? "

You think Gartner is still some kind of VP at Provista? Based on what? The only evidence of that claim that I find is Gartner's LinkedIn page. The Provista website doesn't back up this claim and neither do any of the legal documents filed by Provista.

Haven't we established that LinkedIn is an unreliable source for DD?