entirely missed my point, and TOTAL BS!!
my point, the rational one, was the rtc deal was a sham from the beginning. let's not forget the deal was with rtc, not with plasma. for that, uspr gave it's ceo and a director 300 million shares. which was more then twice the o/s at that time.
the restructuring brought it down to 125 million shares. but, again, as i said before, this deal was to enrich the ceo and the director's pocket. at the cost of uspr shraeholders.
the fact it is cancelled now has no bearing on the FACT it never should have been agreed to in the first place.
i never said USPR HAS TO PROVE THE DRILLING TEAM EXISTS. again, not sure what the confusion is. i said we have no confirmation it is being done be their previously announced "operator" Act Holding, or the previously announced subcontractors.
the point was we have no proof that current management has not cancelled, or ignored, their announcement and did something different.
as for RECOMMENDATIONS--- A DIRECT QUOTE FROM USPR'S NON COMPLIANT 43-101. ANY OF THIS DONE????
• More work on the geological interpretation is needed as a first step before additional drilling commences
• Data handling in the field and office needs standardization and improvement.
• All mapping must be converted to the same grid system. This will allow incorporation of information from past exploration work.
• Density measurements are needed for the mineralized zones and the surrounding rocks.
• A written sample handling procedure is needed.
• Metallurgical testing is needed to determine whether the copper/silver bearing sulfides can be separated from the gold bearing sulfides.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
