Replies to post #70158 on Medinah Minerals (MDMN)

[Beth0515]

It is impossible to accurately read between the lines with this train wreck of dilution and value destruction. I'm sticking it out to the bitter end, though, as this is better than a Vonnegut novel. I may write a book about greed, thievery and naivety after it is over. Anyone know if I can offset book royalty income with long term capital losses? ;-)

[Hurricane_Rick]

unless the use of NI 43-101 is in the deck to purposely try and dupe naive investors who don't understand Canadian standards and when they may or may not be used.

I don't know why they opted to include it, but the duping naive investors doesn't hold too much water within the context of this deck. The deck was so bland and devoid of sizzle, pump or excitement. You have to look hard to find where NI 43-101 is mentioned and it is done so flaccidly anyway. There is plenty of information that MDMN could have flaunted/exaggerated in this deck to "dupe naive investors". Heck, there is recent factual data and developments that would dress it up nicer...as I mentioned in my previous post. There is no way this deck is being used to dupe anyone...other than to just keep a lid on what Auryn is actually doing at ADL.