Replies to post #26875 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[keepemcloser]

Ikabb great post,I agree!

[IKABB]

Furthermore, organizations like Techrights base their arguments on a lawsuits such as Alice101 (mentioned in the article previously) and the focus on monopolizing software algorithms, which IMO is flawed at least.

Google uses patented software algorithms to perform ALL of it's web searches. If we follow what this article states, we would then be insinuating that Google's patents are now worthless too? That's IMO, non-sense!

[Na$ty19]

Hey interpret and analyze the source any way you like. I was simply posting a link to a 3rd party that had a recent write up on vplm. I came across it while researching how anything anybody in the world does on the internet violates RBR. Welcome to the party

[DungSpawter]

I like your take on this. Hadn't considered the fact that by lumping VP in with the others they are implying VP patents must have some value. Why even bother mentioning it otherwise.

[nyt]

Vplm & it patents are no secret, contrary to what many have said before..... thus not surprising that mention of them, (since they claim to be the technical leader of the voip industry & have the voip controlling portfolio, which "cannot be circumvented" (paraphrased) ). I don't see at all how you interpret that pertinent mention of vplm, to equate to value. For the umpteenth time, if the patents had some great (if any) value, Mr big dogs would've snatched it up long ago by now and not only thereby fended off all the back infringement they would eventually beholding to, but they would also, in the one fell swoop, easily & by default, became the real leader of the pack & probably wind up fighting off monopoly charges. This whole vplm patent "story", more & more everyday, seems to be just that...... a whopper of a yarn.... and as time marches on, seems to prove it so.