This is perhaps the norm or familiar for such a share/product in such a market...where are the precedents ?
The STWA story can't be totally unique or unprecedented in every way
why is it that the closer we get to the eventual metric or success ..ie a contract....the lower the share price falls? the same question being, why do the market makers bother ?
Maybe it is a simple case of inverted snobbery....in which the market dictates there will be not one step towards $200 per share until we have all the proof..
no half way measures or gradual confidence allowed
Kinda like Kyte's "unsolicited interest" in the Elektra that would make STWA profitable in 2010? Kinda like the financing they were on the verge of getting to bring Elektra to market?
Funny how there is now 100% universal agreement on this board that the Elektra and all STWA and Tao's claims were lies, yet the company is to be believed now?