Of equal importance, Malcolm is not Kim.
Malcolm can go to a lab and go to work applying his extensive knowledge on gene manipulation particular to our platform worms, and desired fiber properties. This is a very beautiful thing.
Kim sees to the running of a company......Malcolm doesn't. But saying KBLB is all Fraser? That is quite an armchair declaration. There is no KBLB without Kim's idea, and collusion with Malcolm. Malcolm does science. Does he ever do our science if he is never approached with the idea Kim brought to him? Kim does business. There is much more to running a business, public or private. No success in the science, then there is no need for patents and trademarks, trade shows, shareholders, PR and IR, production concerns(of which there are many more than 1), channel partners, SEC, VN and other countries, and probably everyday office concerns. KBLB is by no means all Fraser. As wonderful as the science is... and needs to be, it is a part of the whole. I tried and can only come up with the above additional parts. There are more I am sure.
You can talk up accuracy as it applies to proof of MS production, but then go and use extreme exaggerations as applied to KBLB, the company? I expect better consistency standards....though I understand the bias.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
