Replies to post #29003 on Intel Corp (INTC)

[Tenchu]

Joe, You seem to be all over the place. It is everything other that what it really is: Making Intel stop illegal monopolistic behaviour and making Intel pay for past violations.

Puh-lease. You could poke so many holes in AMD's case, it's embarrassing. But of course, you're less concerned about AMD's mudslinging and more concerned about what sticks.

Like I said before, whatever means necessary for AMD to get ahead in this cutthroat business. Monopolistic behaviour? Been there, done that, samo samo. Hope you have the 9th "Circus" Court of Appeals on your side.

Tenchu

[alan81]

Oh come on--
It is everything other that what it really is: Making Intel stop illegal monopolistic behaviour and making Intel pay for past violations.
If it was really about this they would not have prominently posted it on their web site. They would not have used layman friendly language in the lawsuit. They would not have taken out newspaper ads. The lawsuit is ONLY about PR.
--Alan