InvestorsHub Logo

Solar_Express

07/21/15 1:45 PM

#39985 RE: chessmite #39984

Next up is further info on "trial orders". Until then its chill time..

Spartak11

07/21/15 2:21 PM

#39986 RE: chessmite #39984

Stressed? Really? I will let the snarky comment go. Honestly, I bought in at .06 and sold around .30. I bought in again around .14. I am long on this stock, but I won't hesitate to sell if I see an irrational spike like last year.

It's just tiring to see the constant non objective analysis of why QTMMs SP is where we are.

The pros are that QMC has made huge progress in setting themselves up in an emerging market. They also have a decent share structure. They appear to be close. They have facilities and capacities to produce quantity to meet demand. They have a trademark and patents. I have said consistently that I believe they are close and have the tools to succeed.

The negatives or hesitations are that they are a penny stock. They have zero revenues. They have no sales. They have made promises on financial statements consistently that they failed to meet. They have competitors that are selling QDs. No one has vetted their product.

I just wanted to know why you think CSTI or CDEL is the reason this stock isn't moving when they haven't made a single dollar yet? Why do people assume a conspiracy theory for the SP? It's very simple....revenues and sale = SP rise. Not MMs playing games to somehow stop the mass of people from buying shares.

SUNYN75

07/21/15 2:22 PM

#39987 RE: chessmite #39984

I like Sideways movement....That I refer to as "Building Cause " for retesting that ".24"....It has already tested the "Low" without conviction...

Regards

Sunny:>)))

Spartak11

07/21/15 2:26 PM

#39988 RE: chessmite #39984

Also, you just proved my whole point with your post. This will run with REVENUE or SALES. Sure the sideways move is nice and the chart looks primed for a small run. But it will get crushed just like last year without a contract.