InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

DaddyR

07/18/15 9:16 PM

#22364 RE: Illumin8edSurfer #22356

You know, if we would just do roadside tests for impairment, period, then it really wouldnt matter what the person was impaired by. If you're impaired, you're impaired. It really is simple. Come up with a more cohesive coordination type of test, that can test for impairment from anything, be it alcohol, pot, LSD, pills, or hell, just plain tiredness. If you fail the impairment test, you are taken off the road, period. If you fail the impairment test, and then later test for "x-amount" of level of alcohol or drugs, you get charged with DUI. If you were just tired, you get a warning, and then a fine. But if you do not fail the impairment test at all, then you should be free to go. It really is that simple. There are plenty of folks out there who can drive with a certain level of intoxicants, and plenty of people who can't. Impairment levels are different for everyone, for all substances, not just psycho-actives.
icon url

Ragz2Richez

07/18/15 9:22 PM

#22365 RE: Illumin8edSurfer #22356

Post history, better read back before jumping into a conversation without knowing the context....but nice try. I can drive high because it doesn't physically impair me, but i know better than to drive drunk because it does physically impair me. P.s. LSD has different affects as well from marijuana but that is not the argument. Please stay on topic and read past posts for context.