InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

FACTSONLYDD

07/14/15 12:28 AM

#31853 RE: PinkyKing10 #31850

So was Fortune article fluff? Was the FOX TV appearance fluff? Was the Huffington Post? Tonner Website confirming deal? Etc???

If so ... how... FORTUNE.com AS IN FORTUNE MAGAZINE....
icon url

Voices of Reason

07/14/15 8:18 AM

#31858 RE: PinkyKing10 #31850

PinkyKing10 - I think that is a measured approach. One thing to consider is that during the most recent runup to $0.01, it literally took hundreds of millions of shares to reach that plateau - on the positive side, the company was able to generate support through timely news releases to attain that kind of volume (and someone clearly profited), but on the negative side, despite that kind of volume, it only went to $0.01 and quickly fell to 1/3rd of that value within days. If the company, through its PR efforts, is unable to break through $0.01 (OTC QB minimum requirements to get the "stinky pinky" label lifted), how will it ever reach loftier goals of ever getting on a legitimate (Nasdaq, AMEX, NYSE) exchange?

On the sales side, getting into +/-2900 Walmart stores may seem like the saving grace - however, looking over the sales history, after figuring in cost of sales, even selling $1 million+ dolls this year would only generate a modest gross margin (if any). Factoring in the runaway O/S's, interest expense, corporate G&A, marketing, debt, and convertible notes - the prospect as a shareholder of retaining any value is dismal at best.