The DATE and the MINUTES of ALL meetings are available to the Shareholders through the NEVADA Secretary of STATE. It "APPEARS" there are "QUESTIONS ABOUT" The Accuracy and Completeness of your questions content (QUOTE "Can we vote for the SEC to not delist") . HYPOTHETICAL questions can only be ANSWERED when Raised as ISSUES at a Shareholder Meeting...........Although you feel that it was not *Normal Course of Business* to AWARD the EXCLUSIVE LICENSING DEAL to Eyetalk and get the COURT BALL ROLLING (rather WELL I would ADD), If you feel it would have been better to rely on REVO with NO money to INITIATE any COURT proceedings, or NO Benefit to 40% NET of GROSS ROYALTY REVENUES (expense free) and SOFTWARE Expertise and capabilities (ongoing expense free development) from ROSS HELFER,................ or the OBVIOUS problems REVO faced in NEGOTIATING with DEEP POCKET (Billion Dollar) potential License/Patent buyers PRIOR to a COURT CHALLENGE at that point in Time, SUBJECT to WHATEVER Terms a "DEEP POCKET BUYER would impose in an OFFER, and obviously NOT AFRAID of an UNPROVEN WIDELY infringed PATENT Holder with NO President to ACTIONS against INFRINGERS and NO FORESEEABLE ability to BRING ACTIONS, and they were already GETTING AWAY with INFRINGING UNCHECKED, and you were tiny no revenue DAVID negotiating with MEGA BUCKS GOLIATH ..........TELL THEM of the GUARANTEED BETTER OUTCOME you saw, and WHY they made such a BAD CHOICE.....You can PRESENT EVIDENCE and call for a MOVE TO REVOKE Eyetalk on the grounds that they are responsible to bring ALL INFRINGERS to comply and only have 3 so far..........THAT is part of the EYETALK365 DEAL..........The Share Holders could VOTE to ENFORCE THAT. ... Which WOULD Make any SETTLEMENT Agreements with EYETALK365 UNENFORCEABLE and VOID and START OVER???????............The BEST ANSWER I can give you is SHAREHOLDERS can VOTE SOME or ALL BOARD MEMBERS OUT............if you feel that is a VIABLE Solution start a CAMPAIGN to RUN FOR OFFICER!!!!!!!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
