InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

FreezeThese

07/08/15 12:36 PM

#73184 RE: DFH84 #73181

Certainly possible but seems unlikely. They could've requested the court enter a default judgment based on ECIG's failure to answer timely. Voluntarily dismissing instead suggests they may have been bluffing frankly.

Concern still remains for:
2:14-cv-01645-GW-MRW
2:14-cv-01651-GW-MRW

Both involve Patent Infringement claims surrounding FIN and Victory E-Cig components.