4. Petrozene is not revolutionary and there is no apparent interest in the oil industry. (Though the poster is vague... maybe FSNR has a new product that will revolutionize a different industry.)
6. FSNR has a young CEO. Genius is debatable. Leadership ability is unproven.
7. Dynamis Energy has a VC fund that has deep pockets (according to some posters). Dynamis Energy has no known secured access to those "deep pockets" for additional investment. Dynamis Energy is not known to have commercially implemented anything.
Do your own DD.
11. FSNR has not implemented any of it's business plans to a revenue-generating business. 12. FSNR has frequently changed business plans, often with no reference to past business plans. 13. FSNR stock tends to fluctuate between $0.06 and $0.25 on low volume. It often stays mired at a tight price point for months, before drifting to a new price point. 14. FSNR deals and business plans are continually "several months away". 15. FSNR has an active support base continually hyping the future of the company based on information that is not available to the public.