Replies to post #225496 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[Protector]

edcpf, the terminology is not conclusive.

Patients inclus is indeed the #enrolled and hence 2 on 3 months is correct and so Rennes keeps up the paste (7 patients in 12 months or about 1 every 60 days versus simulation consensus of 1 patients per 112 days) and outperforms simulation or simulation assumptions are way to strict.

The 6 can be miss interpreted. "à inclure" can as well mean: STILL to be included as it can mean TOTAL to be included.

I posted on the topic here.

However, with the move from 5/6 to 7/6 I think the terminology becomes conclusive. 6 was the TOTAL aimed for and Rennes, as part of the competitive enrolment, did indeed get a patient above their quota.

So actually we have a treatment centre that, if there was no competitive enrolment, did enrol the assigned # of patients in about 12 months. If this would, at least, be a European tendency (social security, low access threshold, etc) then it could explain why PPHM didn't open the last 20 European centres. But we don't know. Maybe 14th July will bring some more of the puzzle pcs.