InvestorsHub Logo

coolcoins

07/07/15 4:48 PM

#37214 RE: Liveingreenbay #37213

I believe that "On June 29, 2015 Scepter Holdings, inc. entered into a Non- Binding Term Sheet Belfleur Inc. to acquire an interest in a 90 megawatt solar power project Located in South Africa." was poorly edited, and they meant to say that Scepter and Belfleur entered into a non-binding term sheet. Here I found the definition for that word, http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/termsheet.asp.

I don't know anything about the relationships of any of the Kersters except for what I've read about here from some of the other posts.

WarMachine

07/07/15 8:32 PM

#37215 RE: Liveingreenbay #37213

Pretty sure you read it wrong but it was a horribly written blurb so I won't hold you accountable. lol

Does it not say Term Sheet then Belfleur. Either way, it was left intentionally vague for this very reason. It allows the imagination to come up with grandiose scenarios in order to propagate rumor rather than the company getting in trouble for outright fraud.

Personally, I wouldn't put any weight into this latest FLUFF PR