InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

wilma6311

07/03/15 5:43 PM

#313707 RE: Poptech #313704

POP, the argument there is that he will do it for the 30mil in NOLs yet that was my first argument against it. An IPO could be worth billions to PSS. The notion was completely shot down. Good luck though. I've been tooting this horn for nearly a year. Yet the "followers" come here and try and drag ppl to the empty shell to get them to invest because they need a place where the pps can be pumped on bs. Everybody needs something to believe in I guess.
icon url

jacksira

07/04/15 2:27 AM

#313709 RE: Poptech #313704

Maybe he can treat his shareholders better than LM., and YA. I think the smart money is to buy Allscripts. If the IPO pops their holdings in the IPO shares should cause their stock price to go up! I don't get it why so many smart people need to buy millions of shares in a penny stock anyways. Does anyone every make any "REAL" money in penny stocks. They seem to me to be very manipulated and the SEC, and FINRA doesn't even consider them legit stocks? No supervision at best look at NEOM this stock price was gutted over the years. Now the shareholders are holding worthless shares, and the Commander in Thief is still making 1/2 million a year doing what? She can't even post a press release we all know she doesn't give a DAMN about her shareholders, just a nuisance to her over the years.
icon url

lesnshawn

07/06/15 9:20 AM

#313722 RE: Poptech #313704

Popt: Where is the evidence that he's looking for Wall St. and the TBTF banks to raise capital for him? He's put about $1.5BB of his own capital into NantWorks, LLC of which NantHealth, LLC is a subsidiary of. All told, he's already received close to that in matching private equity capital investments made in various amounts to various NantWorks, LLC subsidiaries over the past couple years. And, the private money just KEEPS ROLLING IN.

Besides which, he can conduct HIMSELF an APO at the time he reverse merges into public existence and thereby being able to move DIRECTLY to one of the big boards, bypassing the "seasoning" period requirement to be on the OTC:BB for a period of time before being able to move up in exchanges.

He and his wife are currently actively looking to give away an additional $1BB in philanthropy money across 10 different so why would he pay others to raise more money for him, which is essentially what he'd be doing taking NantHealth public via a TRADITIONAL IPO?

He wouldn't. Nobody in his position in their right mind would.

That's why Forbes told us in straight, unambiguous terms that the IPO for NantHealth, LLC will be in the form of a TRACKING STOCK IPO...much much different than your average IPO and requires the parent company to be public first.

Address that point. Please.

Is Forbes wrong in their reporting?

Why the complete secrecy surrounding when is NantWorks, LLC going public and more importantly, how?

lns