Honestly, I think the company stands a greater chance of success as a licensor of technology, rather than a manufacturer (I've said that all along). I think I am on the record as stating that their purchase of RV tech and their launch and manufacture of phones was doomed to fail, and for all the reasons listed in the report, that is the competition is too great, and the product cycle too short.
Now the question is, is this a legitimate strategic redirection (from a manufacturer to a licensor) or just a further extension of a nut shell game to confuse investors? I mean they did start out as a tech company, then when that strategy failed focused on becoming a manufacturer (which they never had a chance of succeeding at) and now they are going back to being a tech company.
With all the "insiders' here, was there some indication given during the last 6 months that they were giving up their manufacturing strategy?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
