Absolutely nothing. The new judge is stepping back and asking for new depositions and testimony. It doesn't change the crux of this case. Simply audited financials were needed to start the 30 day countdown for Funds payment not unaudited.
To me it looks like the whole system is lacking in professionalism. The time this has taken is beyond belief. The Advisory guys have tried to shake FUND out so many times that our original judge got too old to continue lol, now we have a new judge who wants FUND to spoon feed him all the data again. I have not see anything that suggests Advisory has an argument against why they did not provide the proper audited statement to FUND as per the contract. Thats ll that really matters here. The rest is a smoke screen by Advisory to buy time IMO. The good thing is they will have to carry all the legal costs at the end and FUND shareholders will just get paid out it appears. I think we need a judge with b@lls who says it in hard facts that Advisory will respond too and not this soft approach that only adds to time and legals costs.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
