There may be additional charges, but I think the reason they let the pump play out--and in this case they didn't let it play out for long, only a few days before they suspended--was that they wanted to be able to show in court that Mulholland's entities were making tens of millions on the CYNK scam. I'm sure it's easier to get a conviction when you can prove to a jury that the defendant profited enormously, rather than just planned to do so.
And don't forget that others have already been charged in connection with related crimes in the Bandfield case.
If that's the case who profited off the short sales from $21 down to 15 cents? Are those also considered I'll-gotten gains by those entities or individuals?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
