Replies to post #63231 on International Consolidated Companies Inc (INCC)

[Grifter]

No, because those tweets are from the company and support other DD and information out there.

Just calling it BS and lies? No, prove it's BS and lies. That burden is not on me or others sharing information.

Call it a lie based on ... "I don't think so" or "I don't believe it!" No, back it up! Disprove it! Can't do it, then it stands as fact.

I'm tired of INCC DD being shared for free ... and then it also has to be defended? NO! Disprove it with counter DD!

[Grifter]

No. The burden of proof falls on those tying to disprove facts that are given and straight from sources.

[stringofpearls]

INCC-not-interested-in-FACT-checking……very-good-at…..RUMOR-mongering

-----no Gro Pro production

-----no Salida grow op

-----no patent info or USPTO registration

-----no application at Huerfano County

-----no application for water permit per the State's website

these are just VERIFIED, POSTED "FACT checks" that INCC cant TWIST>>>>>>3rd party LINKS that show no action or verifiable connection to the INCC TWEETS related to each supposed task…..



so when INCC is politelly asked to provide supportive PROOF of a HEMP rumor……

….all that INCC can do is stutter "prove us wrong" and that is a TOTAL FAIL and code for…..

…. JK, hoped ya liked the TWEET , nothing to show shareholders except more stories……………



and INCC wonders why it has no credibility or why the PPS doesnt even move with TWEETS…...

…………..SAD