Common sense replies
1. R/S talk started 6 months prior to VZ announcement. SOunds like contingent plan if deal doesn't pan out. If R/S planned, why put it on 3 Q reports and not just do it.
2. VZ relationship confirmed by Stefanski/Tarrant. PR states Vertical Solutions Provider with co-marketing
3. They were finally responding prior to all the FB/TWTR trolls.
4. There have also been times when people have been sitting at the desks and had a conversation with visitors (TXinvestor)
5. I have personally received an email from the company
6. PR on postponement states adding webcast in addition. Takes some time.
7. Old symbol with different mgmt and bought as a relatively clean shell.
8. Used to show revenue when they were focused on tower work, but changing business plans can set a company back in the rev dept.
9. Does it not work?? I could care less it it were written in crayon. The info is just outdated.
10. Does one expect Dallas to be Atlantis and permanently flooded?
Other (my) facts:
1. payroll taxes owed have increased YOY due to hiring
2. Several private investors have loaned money (see $250,000 cash infusion)
3. Several investors have bought 20-100k of shares in the company as Rule 504 shares
4. If you have been watching the share volume, there has been no dumping/dilution (see number 3) which would be indicative of a so-called scam.
5. no fluff PR's to drum up support (see number 4)
6. Recognition by VZ innovation award makes the current VZ partnership very, very likely
7. Strobel and Heikenfeld
8. CC was certainly planned with a real CC phone number and everything. Can't control the weather 3-4 in advance.
9. O/S have not changed in almost 2 years
10. In April 15, 2013 Q report they told us what they were up to. "The company is in the early stages of implementing a proprietary cloud based back-office infrastructure, new improved financial/operational controls,
recruiting, hiring, training and equipping tower crews, technical and engineering workforce, installing a technical command center, and increasing its management team and advisory boards. The company feels this strategy, while being heavy on front load costs, will prove to be beneficial in meeting both the company’s long-term profitability goals as opposed to the short term, and that of their customers."
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
