InvestorsHub Logo

stushy

06/06/06 2:17 PM

#9969 RE: Lochan #9964

lochan...I agree! People who say this won't see 2.17 for a year are wrong..I'm bettin within months..

GO NDOL

honest ed

06/06/06 2:31 PM

#9979 RE: Lochan #9964

I'll take your hare-brained commentary to heart (NOT) .... you watch... mark this post and mark my words GP will be deep-sixed in less than 6 weeks ... GUARANTEED !

BTW keep your condescending patronizing comments for your children ... same for you benz dealor (which should be spelled dealer, but I digress).

Lochan

06/06/06 2:32 PM

#9980 RE: Lochan #9964

One thing that impressed me on the 8-K financials was that the consolidated retained earnings as of 3/31/06 was
$92,924,491. Another item is that intangible assets are listed at $99,402,604. I assume this is the intrinsic net value of the company's lease agreements.

There are so many pink sheet companies that have hardly any revenues and show a deficit in retained earnings running into the millions. The 8-K figures indicate this to be a very sound investment, indeed.

Many here have noted misprints on PRs, and the same occurs on the 8-K. On the consolidated interim income statement for the first quarter of 2006, it is stated that the Net Income/(Loss)
per common share is $2,803,903. This is actually the company's first quarter Net Income. No figure is given for
earnings per share. I am very surprised that such an important
error was not picked up by the auditing firm. There are other
smaller mistakes as well, but not significant enough to be mentioned here.