Replies to post #5582 on Hipcricket Inc.(fka HIPPQ)

[Bp12]

You may be correct with that assessment Hawk...Then again, you may not be... Time will tell... But it looks like there are more reasons to keep it public than not.. But we shall see. ..

[FORTY-8]

That "other business" just so happens to CONVENIENTLY be almost identical to that of Hipp Cricket (thereby adhering to one of the Tax Code's most rigorous requirements for the transfer of NOLs).

HOWEVER, IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY LOSS CARRY-FORWARDS, and because of that it must fork over to Uncle Sam a whopping 35% of its net revnue each and every year of its operations going forward.

Doesn't it strike you as 'odd', and maybe even 'downright stupid' to gut a business for a few patents and such ... while abandoning the single most valuable asset of that gutted business ... an asset that could protect your revenue stream for years to come?

Are we so foolish as to believe that?

Do YOU believe that?