but let us keep in mind the differences in our case09999999999999e
There the challenge is the first action - the very first action during emergency and chaotic times is being challenged as too onerous - too expansive and expensive
In the case of FNMA EQUITY CURRENT MAJOR cases - FNMA the attack is on the CHANGE in the deal AFTER the original onerous action. The focus of Fairholme is there was a switch post fact - that switch had one entity - Treasury - on both sides of the deal - (offering it and accepting it)_ --- and the third amendment in our case would kill the company as it is not a debate on 10 20 30 percent interest but on how the H does the GOV take it all - a complete taking with no compensation to original owners (actually no compensation to owners at that time)