The foreign aid bill includes $2.34 billion military aid for Israel and $120 million civilian aid. Civilian aid will end in 2009.
Ran Dagoni, Washington 28 May 06 12:43
On Friday, the US House of Representatives Appropriations Committee approved the 2007 house foreign aid bill, which includes $2.46 billion for Israel.
$2.34 billion of this amount will be military aid, and $120 million will be civilian aid. US aid for Israel is calculated according to a formula set in the late 1990s by then-Minister of Finance Yaakov Neeman and then Israel Economic Minister to Washington Ohad Marani to gradually eliminate US civilian aid to Israel, and which was adopted by the US administration.
The feeling in Israel at the time was Congress would not support civilian aid for long to a country with a developed economy like Israel’s. Under the formula, US civilian aid for Israel is cut by $120 million a year, until it’s elimination in the 2009 US fiscal year.
At the same time, US military aid for Israel would increase by - $60 million a year to a ceiling of $2.4 billion a year, beginning in 2009. Israel will receive its last $60 million of US civilian aid in the 2008 US fiscal year. The House appropriations bill must now go to a House plenum vote. The US Senate is now preparing its own appropriations bill. When approved, the two bills will go to a joint appropriations committee, which will reach a compromise between the House and Senate bills.
Under the House bill, US foreign aid will total $23.1 billion in 2007. As in every year, Israel is the largest recipient of US foreign aid, followed by Egypt ($1.7 billion, including $1.3 billion in military aid). Efforts by the Egyptian government to strangle emerging signs of democracy in the country have roused the ire of Congress, and caused Congressman David Obey (Dem.-Wisconsin), the ranking Democratic on the House Appropriations Committee, to initiate a proposal to freeze some aid to Egypt until democratic reforms are instituted.
However, the Bush administration made it clear that it opposed the initiative. US government officials and other legislators said Egypt was an important US ally in the war on terrorism. Nevertheless, even supporters of US aid for Egypt expressed concern about its poor human rights record.
Members of Congress are most incensed over the Egyptian government’s persecution of opposition activist and MP Iman Noor, sentenced to 5 years in prison by a Cairo court. Critics claim the charges were bogus. Congressman Obey’s amendment to the House foreign aid bill failed to pass the committee, but he and Congressman Tom Lantos (Dem.-California) have initiated a second, much tougher amendment, than the one that failed in committee.
The House foreign aid bill includes $3.4 billion to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria; $522 million for stabilization efforts in Iraq; and $962 million for Afghanistan.
Published by Globes [online], Israel business news - http://www.globes.co.il - on May 28, 2006
"In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people - Yield themselves with Perfect Docility to Our Molding Hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work - Our own Good Will upon a Grateful and Responsive Folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into Philosophers or men of Learning or Science. We are not to raise up from among them Authors, Orators, Poets, or Men of Letters. We shall not search for embryo great Artists, Painters, Musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them Lawyers, Doctors, Preachers, Politicians, Statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply." ~ Frederick Gates - Rockefeller Foundation,Director of Charity,1913. a.k.a.- Rockenfelder - Spanish Morrano CONVERTS to Christianity Who Helped Bring us WWII by COLLABORATING with Rothschild a.k.a.- Red-Shield/Bauer ZIONIST Khazar BANK and the VATICAN
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." ~ David Rockefeller, at a 1991 Bilderberger meeting..
-{;!;}- (;!;) "{^!^}" ("(^!^)") "(;!;)" "{;!;}" -"(^!^)"- <{;_!_;} "The Jewish people as a whole will be its own Messiah. It will attainworld dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition offrontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of aworld republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. — In this "new world order" the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, andeverywhere to make use of the resources of the state. — Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands." -Baruch Levy, Letter to Karl Marx,`La Revue de Paris', p.574,June 1,1928 =========== Rothschild Quotes at: http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm Rothschild Quote: Honest Words From a SHYSTER Family "The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its — Profits or so Dependent on its Favors that there will be No Opposition from that class, while on the other hand, — the Great Body of People, mentally incapable of comprehending the TREMENDOUS Advantages... — will Bear its Burden without complaint, and perhaps Without Suspecting the system is Inimical to their Best Interests."
1862: — “If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then — That Government will Furnish its Own Money without Cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.” (1862) ~ Times of London, Comment on Lincoln printing Debt-Free Money 1864: President Abraham Lincoln discovers the Tsar of Russia, Alexander II (1855 – 1881), was having problems with the Rothschilds as well as he was refusing their continual attempts to set up a central bank in Russia. President Lincoln asks the Tsar for help in the Civil War and the Tsar sent part of his fleet to anchor off N.Y.C. and the other part off Calif. The Tsar made it clear to the British, French and Spanish that if they attacked either side, Russia would take the side of President Lincoln. Lincoln subsequently won the Civil War. 1876: Otto von Bismarck states, “The division of the United States into two federations of equal force was decided long before the civil war by the high financial power of Europe.These bankers were afraid that the United States, if they remained in one block and as one nation, would attain economical and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world. The voice of the Rothschilds predominated. They foresaw the tremendous booty if they could substitute 2 feeble democracies, indebted to the financiers, to the vigorous Republic, confident and self-providing. Therefore they started their emissaries in order to exploit the question of slavery and thus dig an abyss between the two parts of the Republic.” 1891: The British Labour Leader makes the following statement on the subject of the Rothschilds, — “This blood-sucking crew has been the cause of untold mischief and misery in Europe during the present century, and has piled up its prodigious wealth chiefly through fomenting wars between States which ought never to have quarrelled. Whenever there is trouble in Europe, wherever rumours of war circulate and men’s minds are distraught with fear of change and calamity you may be sure that a hook-nosed Rothschild is at his games somewhere near the region of the disturbance.” 1917: The Rothschilds order the execution by the Bolsheviks they control, of Tsar Nicholas II and his entire family in Russia. This is the Rothschilds revenge for Tsar Alexander II siding with President Abraham Lincoln in 1864. — It is extremely important for them to Slaughter the Entire Family including women and children in order to Show the World,
1934: Swiss banking secrecy laws are reformed and it becomes an offence resulting in imprisonment for any bank employee to violate bank secrecy. This is all in preparation for the Rothschild engineered Second World War in which as usual they will fund both sides. Revisionist History no. 40: The Zionist Who Founded Communism. — In-depth study of Moses Hess, Trojan horse in the war of ideologies; the man Karl Marx called, — "My Communist Rabbi." His slippery Hegelian dialectics;— Nazi connection; Communist-Zionist links;— Hess and Judaism; the Communist ideology of Hess;— Marx and Judaism; and more. Stunning insights into the founding of Communism and Zionism and the occult process by which these movements were propelled. http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=10020
-{;!;}- (;!;) "{^!^}" ("(^!^)") "(;!;)" "{;!;}" -"(^!^)"- EXPOSÉ: The “CHRISTIAN” Mafia, "The Fellowship"
Outstanding post Vexari! The entire article should be read by all.
Some excerpts:
""The theme suggests a practical implication. It is not that government has accomplished the "impossible" of practically denying the right, but rather that the "spirit of liberty" has almost "wholly disappeared and the people have become servile and debased." But "fitness" to exercise the rights of freemen is never determined by the many who have become servile, but by the few who refuse, at any cost, to surrender their rights to government""
"In a real sense, the Right of Petition is like the right of self-defense. Where a person is justly aggrieved, government has in effect previously assaulted him or his rights. By petitioning for redress, he is exercising his right of self-defense against that onslaught. When government fails or refuses to justly redress, the conditions of assault and aggrievement continue and the individual is entitled by that right, to take greater and greater measures to obtain justice from his government oppressor, as his means of self defense against government oppression.
Violence in response to oppression is a natural expression of the Right of Petition when its non-violent expression is abridged. Just as the common law countenances the violence necessary to defend oneself, so too it authorizes violence against government necessary to get its attention, when it abridges the non violent avenues of seeking just redress for its wrongs."
""The result is that people charged with "criminal exercise of rights" are harnessed with "ineffective assistance of government licensed counsel" who lead them, like Judas Goats leading sheep through a "legal system" redesigned to convict and punish those who oppose government oppression according to the culture of our common law. This not only renders assistance of counsel ineffective, but it is reminiscent of British Star Chamber Practices.(57)
Today, these kinds of cases are proliferating throughout the Nation. The Montana Freemen cases where the "Freemen" were charged and convicted of substantive crimes like bank and mail fraud are cases in point, and there were untold scores of similar prosecutions in their wake. In point, these were really Petition Clause cases where the government oppressively refused to allow the real facts and the First Amendment Law to go to the jury. The Montana Freemen and many others were convicted of the "Criminal Exercise of First Amendment Rights."(58)""
"How can anyone prevent the executive from enforcing constitutionally corrupt laws corruptly, if he is already free from the consequences of violating his oath? All government prosecutors and judges are absolutely immune from accountability for malicious prosecution. So they are not accountable to the people whose constitutional rights they violate. If they are not accountable to the people they wrongfully injure, who, pray tell, are they accountable to?
The power to be unaccountable for corruption in office must be nullified"
"Government is organized to control anything that it believes may injure it. The aftermath of Waco is wide spread exposure to criticism. Government does not admit any wrong at Waco, but it admits that it suffered wide spread criticism. It will do little to prevent more "Wacos", but it will do much to prevent the wide spread criticism. What it will do is act to contain freedom of information to the people, upon which widely spread criticism depends".
""Perhaps it will convince them all the more that the only recourse to government corruption is armed rebellion in the style the world has come to know as "terrorism". That is the style of rebellion the Nation felt at Oklahoma City. It can be worse: Much worse as greater and greater means of mass destruction and mass killing are being designed privately or escape from both foreign and domestic government control. The world is developing markets for the instruments of mass terrorism … and we are the target. The solution is to release our Petition Clause to do its work, then to export it to every nation in the world: "Made in America".""
"Moreover, all of that assumes that the courts are trustworthy as to this issue, and a major theme of this article is that they are not. The judiciary is a part of government and government does not want to see an effective Petition Clause because that nullifies arbitrary power at all levels. Effective petition rights create problems for all of government by requiring direct accountability of government officials to the people they injure. As demonstrated in Part I, supra, the judicial theft of the First Amendment Petition of Right is a fact the judiciary has effectively concealed for over 200 years. Why should anyone believe that the judges would change that concealment and denial policy now?"
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
