Replies to post #311597 on NanoTech Entertainment Inc (NTEK)

[Ovio4K]

He (Big) was right, oddly enough. I don't follow all that has been said as much as I could, but 700k is low ball money, considering the "promise" of revenues beyond that initial payment that NTEK shoved down some unsuspecting Jr. Exec's throat at Paramount. The projections were insane, but the true revenue numbers that came in once Paramount demanded accounting was a pitiful $800 bucks.

That's right longs - NTEK has sent documents to Paramount an accounting to date for "Interstellar" rentals of less than a grand. On a $700K initial payment.

So someone please tell me how this accounting works in any NTEK shareholder's favor?

[DangFool]

He said it publically, too.

Funny enough big made that 700k claim on fb about interstellar and I posted it on here and than foley pm'd me saying it wasn't true.

But then, he also claimed he didn't sell into the Google Super Tweet, so I've got to figure we should take his statements with a grain of salt. Let's not forget that he claimed to have never promoted NTEK securities.

Like maybe Interstellar cost $701K instead, and he sold into the Super Tweet through one of a dozen cutouts.