InvestorsHub Logo

236T568

06/11/15 5:06 PM

#20444 RE: casbboy #20443

Batmasian was never on the board of directors of ADTM


Admittedly, I'm confused by the third boardmember question also. What happened to Batmasian? I know he had that lawsuit specifically directed at him so maybe he removed himself? He only bought another million-plus shares a month ago, so doesn't make sense.


newelong

06/12/15 12:36 PM

#20457 RE: casbboy #20443

casbboy ... Well, ...

"OneScreen created MediaGraph, Inc, which it was designed to look like a holding company for Norman Brodeur -- you will see he has all exec positions -- and created OneScreen Merger Sub, Inc. Two entities whose sole purpose was to commit fraudulent conveyance. MediaGraph was loaded up with straight cash, all OneScreen's cash, that was owed elsewhere and forwarded over to ADTM. Remember, there are bank statements from Chase that prove this."

surely you jest ... do you really expect people to believe all that nonsense ???

"OneScreen created MediaGraph, Inc, which it was designed to look like a holding company for Norman Brodeur -- you will see he has all exec positions"

http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=SNC0wUJ0tg2nR4ZjTlmyFA%253d%253d&nt7=0

Guess again !!

"and created OneScreen Merger Sub, Inc."

Pubco was the merger sub created to collect all of the outstanding shares of Media Graph, Inc. There was never any such animal as, "OneScreen Merger Sub, Inc." ... only OneScreen, Inc.

https://delecorp.delaware.gov/tin/GINameSearch.jsp

Perhaps if you took the time to read the STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT as I suggested before, you just might understand what really happened !!!

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1428397/000114420414043556/v383937_ex10-1.htm

"Two entities whose sole purpose was to commit fraudulent conveyance. MediaGraph was loaded up with straight cash, all OneScreen's cash, that was owed elsewhere and forwarded over to ADTM."

You couldn't be further from the truth ... Media Graph, Inc. was NOT loaded with cash; in fact, if you took the time to look at the Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as I suggested before ...

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1428397/000114420414058064/v389955_ex99-3.htm

you could plainly see that not even a penny was transferred to Adaptive Medias !!! Furthermore, if you really want us to ...

"Remember, there are bank statements from Chase that prove this."

then why don't you produce these statements so we can see for ourselves. I don't know about anyone else, but frankly, based on what I've read heretofore, I'm really not interested in listening to more of your hot air !!

Oh, by the way ...

"If you were just an investor, you'd be worried, not defensive. But again, my assumption could be wrong."

I'm really glad to see you admit that !!!

ADTM