InvestorsHub Logo

Andy3077

06/09/15 8:30 PM

#1574 RE: mike papa #1570

What do you mean "heard"?

It is our policy that all employees, officers and directors must avoid any activity that is or has the appearance of conflicting with the interests of our Company. We conduct a review of all related party transactions for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis and all such transactions relating to executive officers and directors must be approved by the Board. In carrying out this responsibility, the Board has determined that we have the following related party transactions. On May 19, 2015, we established a new Audit Committee that will, going forward, be responsible for reviewing all related party transactions.

Michael R. Long and Louis A. Hoch

As previously disclosed, in 2002, we recognized a loss on margin loans we guaranteed for Michael R. Long, then Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, and our current Chief Executive Officer and, at the time of the transaction, our Chief Financial Officer; and Louis A. Hoch, our President and Chief Operating Officer, in the amounts of $535,302 and $449,371, respectively. In February 2007, we signed employment agreements with Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch that required each to repay his respective obligation to us in four equal annual payments of cash or stock or any combination thereof. In December 2007, we accepted common stock and stock options valued at $133,826 and $112,343 from Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch, respectively, in satisfaction of their annual payments for 2007 as provided for under their respective employment agreements.

In December 2008, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch did not pay us the second annual installment pursuant to their respective employment agreements. They each withheld payment of the installment due because we had deferred payment of their salary increases for 2008 called for under their respective employment agreements. At December 31, 2008, we owed Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch deferred salaries of $110,000 and $100,000, respectively, and Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch owed us $133,825 and $112,343, respectively, for the second installment of their loan repayments. The total amount owed to us for the second installment was $246,168 and is classified as “Related Party Receivable” on our balance sheet at December 31, 2008. On March 30, 2009, we accepted 680,715 shares of our common stock valued at $23,825 and 352,658 shares of our common stock valued at $12,343 from Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch, respectively, in partial satisfaction of their annual payments due to us for 2008 as provided for under their employment agreements. The partial payments of $23,825 and $12,343 made to us by Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch, respectively, equaled the difference between the amount each owed to us for the second installment of their loan repayments and the amount we owed to each executive as deferred salary. The common stock accepted from Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch was valued at $0.035 per share, which was the closing price of the common stock on March 30, 2009. The common stock accepted from Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch was recorded as treasury stock with a total cost of $36,168.


Page | 15


On November 12, 2009, we executed amendments to the employment agreements with Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch. Under the terms of their respective amended employment agreements, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch agreed to reduce their annual base salaries for 2009 to $190,000 and $175,000, respectively, from $375,000 and $350,000, respectively.

In December 2009, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch did not pay us the third annual installment pursuant to their respective employment agreements. They each withheld payment of the installment due because we had partially deferred payment of their salary for 2009 called for under their respective employment agreements. At December 31, 2009, we owed Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch deferred salaries for 2009 of $162,385 and $141,808, respectively, and Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch owed us $133,825 and $112,343, respectively, for the third installment of their loan repayments. The total amount owed to us for the unpaid installments was $456,168 and was classified as “Related Party Receivable” on our balance sheet at December 31, 2009.

On April 12, 2010, we executed a second amendment to the employment agreements with Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch. Under the terms of the second amendment to their respective amended employment agreements, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch agreed to reduce their annual base salaries for 2010 to $24,000 each from $375,000 and $350,000, respectively, and to change their annual bonus limit from 100% of current salary to 100% of the highest salary received in any year of the agreement.

In December 2010, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch did not pay us the fourth and final annual installment pursuant to their respective employment agreements. They each withheld payment of the installment due to our continued inability to pay the deferred salaries that were called for under their respective employment agreements. At December 31, 2010, we owed Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch deferred salaries of $147,368 and $126,915, respectively, in regards to their 2009 deferred salary balances. As of December 31, 2010, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch owed us $133,825 and $112,343, respectively, for the fourth and final installment of their loan repayments. The total amount owed to us for the unpaid installments was classified as “Related Party Receivable” on our balance sheet and was $702,337 and $703,060 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

On January 14, 2011, we executed a third amendment to the employment agreements with Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch. Under the terms of the third amendment to their respective employment agreements, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch agreed to reduce their annual base salaries for 2011 to $24,000 and $24,000, respectively, from $375,000 and $350,000, respectively.

At December 31, 2011, we owed Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch a total of $23,473 and $3,300, respectively, in regards to their 2010 deferred salary balances, which were included in accrued expenses on our balance sheet. We paid the obligations in the first quarter of 2012 and thus, our balance sheet at December 31, 2012 did not reflect any such amounts owed at December 31, 2012.

On July 2, 2012, we executed a fourth amendment to the employment agreements with Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch. Under the terms of the fourth amendment to their respective employment agreements, Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch agreed to amend their annual base salaries for 2012 to $255,000 and $235,000, respectively, from $375,000 and $350,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2012, Mr. Long owed us $377,651 and Mr. Hoch owed us $324,686.

On March 11, 2013, in accordance with our respective employment agreements with Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch, we accepted shares of our common stock owned by Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch as satisfaction in full for the remaining amounts owed to us as annual payments due to the loss on margin loans guaranteed by us for Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch.

On March 11, 2013, we also agreed to purchase additional shares of our common stock owned by Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch, valued at $156,852 and $144,403, respectively, in lieu of the issuances of cash bonuses to Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch. Such bonuses were intended to compensate the executives for their service. As a result, we incurred a one-time reduction in cash of $301,255.

Accordingly, on March 11, 2013, we accepted an aggregate of 2,969,459 shares of our common stock valued at $534,503, and an aggregate of 2,606,051 shares of our common stock valued at $469,089 from Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch, respectively, as satisfaction in full of their aggregated outstanding amounts of $702,337 owed to us and aggregated compensation of $301,255 paid to Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch in lieu of cash bonuses. The common stock accepted from Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch was valued at $0.18 per share, which was the closing price of the common stock on March 1, 2013. The common stock accepted from Mr. Long and Mr. Hoch was recorded as treasury stock and we no longer carry a “Related Party Receivable” on our balance sheet.

Accordingly, following the completion of these transactions we have no remaining receivables or payables related to Mr. Long, Mr. Hoch or any other officer of Payment Data.



Page | 16


Herb Authier

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we paid Herb Authier a total of $35,400 and $35,400 in cash, respectively, for services related to network engineering and administration that he provided to us. Mr. Authier is the father-in-law of Louis Hoch, our President and Chief Operating Officer.

Nikole Hoch

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we purchased $6,227 of corporate imprinted sportswear and caps from Angry Pug Sportswear in 2014. Nikole Hoch, the spouse of our President and Chief Operating Officer Louis Hoch, is the sole owner of Angry Pug Sportswear.



Page | 17


Information about Corporate Governance

Board Leadership Structure

Mr. Long has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our Board of Directors since July 1998. He has also held the position of our Chief Financial Officer from September 2003 to March 2015. As Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Mr. Long manages the day-to-day affairs of our Company and leads the Board meetings. Mr. Hoch has served as our President, Chief Operating Officer, and a director of our Company since July 1998, and also serves as Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors. Dr. Kirby has served as the third director of our Company since June 2001. Effective on April 24, 2015, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Kirk Taylor and Mr. Miguel Chapa as independent directors.

The Board believes that its structure should be informed by the needs and circumstances of our Company, the Board, and our stockholders. With this in mind, the Board believes that its structure is currently serving our Company well, and intends to maintain this where appropriate and practicable in the future.

Risk Oversight Management

The Board of Directors takes an active role, as a whole and at the committee level, in overseeing management regarding our Company’s risks. Our management keeps the Board of Directors apprised of significant risks facing our Company and the approach being taken to understand, manage and mitigate such risks. Specifically, strategic risks are overseen by the full Board of Directors; financial risks are overseen by the Audit Committee; risks relating to compensation plans and arrangements are overseen by the Board; risks associated with director independence and potential conflicts of interest are overseen by the full Board of Directors. On May 19, 2015, we established a new Compensation Committee that will, going forward, be responsible for reviewing all risks related to compensation plans and arrangements. Additional review or reporting on enterprise risks is conducted as needed or as requested by the full Board of Directors or the appropriate committee.

Director Nominations

We consider recommendations for director candidates from our directors, officers, employees, stockholders, customers, and vendors. Stockholders wishing to nominate individuals to serve as directors may submit such nominations, along with a nominee’s qualifications, to our Board of Directors at Payment Data Systems, Inc., 12500 San Pedro, Suite 120, San Antonio, Texas, 78216, and the Board of Directors will consider such nominee.

The Board of Directors selects the director candidates slated for election. The Board of Directors nominates directors for election at each Annual Meeting of Stockholders and appoints new directors to fill vacancies when they arise. We do not have a Nominating Committee in light of resource allocations made by the Board of Directors in its business judgment.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

If you wish to communicate with the Board of Directors, you may send your communication in writing to: Secretary, Payment Data Systems, Inc., 12500 San Pedro, Suite 120, San Antonio, Texas, 78216. Please include your name and address in the written communication and indicate whether you are a stockholder of Payment Data. The Secretary will review any communication received from a stockholder, and all material communications from stockholders will be forwarded to the appropriate director or directors or Committee of the Board of Directors based on the subject matter.


Page | 18


Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation provided to each person who served as a non-employee member of our Board of Directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. Compensation provided to Directors who are also employees is listed in the Summary Compensation Table for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 in the section addressing Executive Compensation.

Name of Director

Fees earned or paid in cash ($)

Stock awards ($)

Option Awards ($)

Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)

Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings ($)

All other compensation ($)

Total ($)

Peter G. Kirby(1)
0 85,000 0 0 0 0 85,000


(1)
Dr. Kirby was our sole non-employee director as of December 31, 2014. He did not receive cash compensation for serving on our Board for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. We have previously granted stock awards to Dr. Kirby as compensation for his prior service on our Board. We have calculated that Dr. Kirby earned $85,000 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which represents the fair value of his accrued stock awards recognized for financial statement reporting purposes only and is not compensation earned by the director. The fair value of each restricted stock award is amortized to expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the restricted stock award for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2014, Dr. Kirby had outstanding 400,000 shares of common stock with a grant date fair value of $36,000 granted on December 27, 2006 that vest on December 27, 2016; 500,000 shares of common stock with a grant date fair value of $27,500 granted on January 9, 2008 that vest on January 9, 2018; and 500,000 shares of common stock with a grant date fair value of $85,000 granted on December 29, 2014 that vest on December 29, 2024. The aggregate grant date fair value of the stock award was calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. See Note 11 of the Notes to our Financial Statements contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for a discussion of all assumptions made by us in determining the values of our stock awards.