Replies to post #35107 on Sigma Labs Inc (SASI)

[kanya]

Fully agreed:
Very nice statement!

[3dtdman]

Thanks, Jackle. Here's what MC said about the collaborative effort with Additive Industries:

“The technology agreement serves to increase collaboration around shared objectives in the 3D printing space, and our PrintRite3D quality assurance software will be tested with equipment currently being developed by Additive Industries. We look forward to working hand-in-hand with them to continue advancing the 3D printing revolution.”

http://3dprintingindustry.com/2014/12/15/sigma-labs-additive-industries-metal-3d-printing/

And the CEO of Additive Industries had this to say:

"“Cooperating with Sigma Labs allows Additive Industries to improve the predictability of the 3D print process, which is critical to advanced applications in markets like aerospace, medical technology, and high-tech equipment,” CEO of Additive Industries Daan Kersten added."

My question for Chris Witty (I've already asked Additive Industries) is this: in the link above, there's a graphic of the Additive Industries "AddLab", also shown here:

http://additiveindustries.com/Partners

Note that they list ten "Partners", and that Sigma Labs isn't included in the list. Why not?

Also, think you did a great job explaining just what PrintRite3D® (note registered trademark symbol) is all about. If it's going to be incorporated in the Additive Industries MetalFAB1™ machines that would be a very good thing indeed. Imagine 60 of these machines in Avio Aero's new 2,400 square meter facility (another link to video posted by Kanya a few days ago):

http://3dprintingindustry.com/2013/12/21/avio-aero-ges-vision-industrial-additive-manufacturing/

Each running 72 hours without user intervention:

When asked about what advantages the MetalFab1 (sic) has over its rivals Kersten told TCT: "This will be the first industrial grade machine, it is an integrated machine that includes the printing and post-processing inside the machine, it has automated handling of build plates and materials so there’s no need to take out the powder or to remove the build plate of the product. This will allow us to run for 72 hours without operator intervention."

http://www.tctmagazine.com/3D-printing-news/additive-industries-launch-metal-3d-printer-at-rapid/

[ZRock]

GM all. as far as I'm concerned it's a done deal GE will be utilizing SGLB PR3D QA (IPQA) system for their 3D printing. All indications are the LEAP engine is a huge success and it contains the 3D printed fuel nozzles. 60% of the reports needed for FAA certification have been submitted and approved. can anyone furnish an alternative to GE's QA needs besides PR3D??
you add to that Honeywell has purchased a PR3D system from SGLB that includes "DEFORM" when it's ready for release. Honeywell was involved in the development of DEFORM. no way are they gonna purchase DEFORM without knowing it works.. Z


http://www.cfmaeroengines.com/press/first-cfm-leap-1a-takes-flight-powering-airbus-a320neo/801

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=66865805

[alanthill]

Jacki says "If two major adopters of industrial scale AM are using it and forcing it on their suppliers then there is a good chance it could be. Especially when there is no competition. Honeywell and GE have spent years testing, and building WITH Sigma, PrintRite3D™ modules." Does anyone but me wonder with all the testing that has been performed by GE and Honeywell on PrintRite3D why there is not more interest in the stock. If the potential is really as great as some of the pundits here claim, I would have thought that there would have been widespread recognition of that fact within the engineering communities of the national testers of the product. Who better than this group would be aware of plans to integrate PrintRite into their manufacturing processes and would be buying SGLB in anticipation of that occurring. Yet the stock has traded in the range of only $40,000 daily volume in the past month. A large part of that $40,000 is likely accounted for by participants in this Board's discussion activities. The projections for PrintRite3D becoming a national or international standard seem to exceptionally premature based upon verifiable market acceptance to date.