InvestorsHub Logo

lonewolfe1586

06/07/15 1:05 PM

#17084 RE: TMMI Believer #17082

They are going to be furious that they will have to pay their lawyers due to dimension screwing up a deal that they more than likely didn't even know about...


Hp is not responsible for anything g other than saying what they did with the code.. Or who's it is... And dimension is sol

smittysstocks

06/07/15 1:16 PM

#17085 RE: TMMI Believer #17082

I seriously doubt HP wants anything to do with this stinky pinky lawsuit issue but they have no choice. As the successor to Iterated they inherit the rights and responsibilities of being the licensor of the VDK 2.0 codec rights.

Once HP has all the facts I presume they will confirm the license to DFI failed due to DFIs inability to issue the required stock to Iterated and that the license to DFMI was the valid one since they met the payment requirements.

As I understand it the other facts will show all the money to pay for the rights came from those in DFMI and that nobody was left in DFI after being moved to DFMI and all of that was confirmed by both sides income tax returns the past 15 years.

This isnt really a case, its a massacre. Why is TMM still staying in this? When your only defense is that your subsidiary commited fraud you are in big trouble.