BEING LIED TO BY THE CEO IS NOT A GOOD WAY TO SELL STOCK. I UNDERSTAND WHY MICHAEL MUST OMIT THE TRUTH HE THINKS HE IS BEING TRUTHFUL BY LEAVING OUT THE FACT THE SHARES GIVEN TO PERVIOUS AND CURRENT EMPLOYEE WERE PROTECTED FOR THE REVERSE SPLIT. I GUESS MICHAEL IS JUST HAVING MOMENTARY LOSS OF MEMORY SEEING HE SIGNED PAMS CONTRACT HE GAVE HER THE SHARES AND THE BIGEST SLAP IN THE COMMON SHAREHOLDERS FACE IS HE HIRED HER TO DO JUST THAT. GET THE REVERSE SPLIT APPROVED AND PROTECT THE COMPENSATED SHARES YOU UNDERSTAND SHARES USED TO PAY PAM TO SCREW THE SHAREHOLDERS. NOT A EQUAL SPLIT FOR THE SHARES AND NOT A EQUAL SPLIT FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS SEING THE EVIL PERSON WHO DRAFTED THIS TUCKED AWAY 13 MILLION SHARES INTO A IRREVOCABLE TRUST AND THESE SHARES DID NOT SPLIT . WE ALL KNOW THIS THE BIG QUESTION IS SEEING MICHAEL HIRED PAM TO HIDE OR PROTECT HER SHARES HOW MANY DID SHE HIDE FOR MICHAEL. WAIT THEY DID NOT HIDE THIS FROM THE SHAREHOLDERS THEY DID IT ALL IN THE OPEN WELL AT LEAST IN PAM’S CASE SO YES IT PAST THE SO CALLED SNIFF TEST AND FINRIA /SEC DID NOTHING BECAUSE ITS ALL LEGAL. NICE JOB MICHAEL I GUESS YOU THOUGHT NO ONE WOULD FIND PAMS CONTRACT SHOWING HOW EVIL YOU ARE AND HOW YOU ARE TOWARD THE SHAREHOLDERS.