InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Slojab

06/06/15 11:07 AM

#29193 RE: harvard_88 #29192

LOLOL!!! "Not a good fit"?

If it was a good concept, how would it not be a good fit? Not "fit" into what? That's a pathetic line of bullshit.

And why would they enter into a concept in the first place if it wouldn't BE a good fit?

Significant evaluation? HA! More like, we played this line of bull as much as we could, now it's time to come up with something else.

Btw, you still haven't told me where you found this news. It wasn't made up, was it? Can you trust the source?
icon url

bulls9999

06/06/15 2:09 PM

#29194 RE: harvard_88 #29192

So the scumbag failed to update shareholders and just changed his mind on his own...how nice.
icon url

Elcappy1

06/07/15 1:07 PM

#29199 RE: harvard_88 #29192

This could be a great thing for CWIR ;) I doubt this will be sitting here for long.
icon url

littlejohn

06/11/15 3:19 AM

#29211 RE: harvard_88 #29192

Its possible that the recent Brand change

on CWIR signalled a Hudson/Grande exit...

Could have been mutual and not worth the

expense to pr in their minds...

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CWIR/profile

That info you posted about is probably about

Onco on the cutting edge pursuit drop...Onco

has evolved to some oil type related biz...

A lovely pr could cut thru some fog...LJ






icon url

Slojab

07/29/15 10:38 AM

#29255 RE: harvard_88 #29192

He's not saying much nowadays.

Question is what is Hudson saying about CWIR & MARIJUANA?

And certainly not anything about Central Worthless.