Replies to post #43214 on Exobox Technologies Corp (EXBX)

[TheLaserGuy]

Wouldn't work produce results?

Like getting square with the SEC by filing financials?

Like holding a long overdue shareholder meeting?

Let's keep avoiding the $144 million dollar elephant in the room and completely ignore that the jack, Jehu Hand, Shaun Irvine and other un named individuals were going to get multimillion dollar paydays while Exobox got delisted.

I have talked with Shaun many times and in my honest opinion he is just a puppet for Jehu Hand, Exobox',s lawyer orchestrating this reverse merger with the jack.

This is not the first time Jehu has had a patsy take a fall when one of his schemes goes awry.

If you want 6 hours of reading Google "Jehu Hand fraud"

Man that guy has been involved in some questionable deals. When his name showed up on SEC documents for Exobox I thought we might be in trouble.

AMFs

[NDebt]

Hey, HansJ, are you still around...

I am pretty stupid, and I will prove it by ignoring my own advice about staying off of IHUB while the court case is on.

But, I have read some of the posts on IHUB with you guys arguing, and I get more confused.

1. Whether or not, a certain deal was good, or another deal was bad, how does Shaun Irvine take control of the EXBX corporation without an election?

2. How does a CEO, or whatever, make a split/merger deal without a shareholder vote?

3. How does a CEO buy super D stock (or whatever it is called) without shareholder approval?

4. How does a corporation go without any shareholder meetings for 4 years or whatever?

Like I said, I don't know much about this stock business. I would think that the merger deal is a mute point if the road to the merger is illegal. Please answer each question with legal authority, and not dodging or misdirection. I am not that smart and have to follow the lines. Thank you for your explanation.

[FunkyCoolModena]

I agree (believe it or not). I think we need to go back almost 5 years to when the former CEO took over.

But I would not agree that Mr. Irvine fully disclosed the terms of the transaction. For instance, who were the less than 10 persons that were to receive 20 million post split shares? (that's just one example)

HansJ, did you ever get a chance to review Exobox' response to the RFA and RFD that they submitted to the Courts last year? Check it out if you can. It's all public info. I'm thinking once you review them, you may have a change of opinion.



Go EXBX, HansJ and Exobox Truth Seeker !!!!!!