The question is why you feel it doesn't have anything to do with the JFK deal. Can you even speculate as to another reason the "management" would give away 80% of the company for ZERO assets in return?
Note the date then review when the shares were given away. It's really quite obvious to anybody without blinders on. JFK, and/or its principles were given 80% of your company in Feb/Mar of this year. The reason you know nothing about it is the fact that Porter lied in his last filing by saying they had no ownership interest in BAYP.