InvestorsHub Logo

ecwizard

06/01/15 9:25 PM

#951 RE: tony fish #950

I fully agree. One of the things I also would like to see is something showing that DOMK has been paid by MOBO. In fact, it seems like that would have gone a long way by allowing DOMK to have some cash flow and possibly letting them address some of the DOMK negatives currently out there. So far I have seen nothing showing that MOBO has paid DOMK anything like they were supposed to.

Frayed Knot

06/03/15 9:12 AM

#955 RE: tony fish #950

My personal opinion, based on watching many scams, somehow these guys were in this together, from the first. BUT I don't know, I am not in on their little plan.

Now the question is, why in the world would Wazzamba - the OWNER of the SimbaDeals platform - renew the license deal that is coming up in July? They haven't been paid, per the DOMK 10Q. And DOMK is the one that signed the agreement, not MOBO.

No way would a business person extend it. But that is just my opinion...

The other question I have always had was -- WHY would Andy "sell" 75% of such a great thing, especially for not much money and stock in an unknown company (MOBO) which was pretty new.."born" in 2013.
http://nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/CorpDetails.aspx?lx8nvq=ztVIvGpikCYxnYTdPEJZvA%253d%253d&nt7=0

Andy COULD Andy sell part of that license agreement? Be interesting to see the agreement between DOMK and Wazzamba to see the "fine print".

All just seemed strange to me, from the first.