sting, when you say:
"...and had KC been his own man, it could have turned out differently. It did not, KC appointmen became a disaster."
I just wonder where that information comes from. All I can find for sure is that Kevin has been silent to the shareholders. I realize that you've said this is your "opinion", but the language is pretty strong and should have some factual basis. Is your opinion based on what someone is telling you?
Who?